The most useful reply here is that Tal keeps choosing initiative over material. If White ever slows down, Black might actually stabilize.
Chaos thread: sound attack or just impossible defense?
Posted like a 'how is this not losing on the spot?' thread. White to move. Is Tal objectively right here, or is this one of those attacks that only works because defense is so hard?
Play the Puzzle
Solve it directly on this main board. After each correct move, the opponent reply autoplays and then it becomes your turn again.
Last Move Played
8... Qh4+
Stored Continuation
9. g3 · 9... Nxg3 · 10. Qf2 · 10... Nxf1 · 11. Qxh4 · 11... Nxe3
White to move
Posted like a 'how is this not losing on the spot?' thread. White to move. Is Tal objectively right here, or is this one of those attacks that only works because defense is so hard?
Find the next move. After you move, the opponent reply autoplays and then it becomes your turn again.
Notes
Written in the tone of a chaos-thread argument where half the replies call the attack unsound and the other half say the defense is impossible for humans. This seeded post is framed as a public discussion board, not as the demo user's own game. The position itself comes from the exact historical PGN of Mikhail Tal vs Vasily Smyslov, Candidates Tournament (1959), sourced from scripts/data/ghost-games-seed.json and linked there via chessgames.com.
Discussion
5 comments
Smyslov's defensive level matters to the evaluation discussion. If he struggles to untangle, that tells you how practical the attack is.
This is exactly the type of board where 'sound' and 'impossible to defend for humans' start to blur together.
You can call it chaos, but every attacking piece has a job and every tempo has a point.
Great comment-section board because the position invites both concrete calculation and a real debate about practical chess.
Signed-in users can comment and build the discussion under this post.